FamilySearch Wiki talk:Featured article criteria

yes this awesome
Steve this is very healthy and excited. What do you think of this, I had put some of this on forums for the criteria?

Dawne 17:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Trustworthy - Do you feel this page has sufficient citations and that those citations come from trustworthy sources?
 * Objective - Do you feel that this page shows a fair representation of all perspectives on the issue?
 * Complete - Do you feel that this page covers the essential topic areas that it should?
 * Well-written - Do you feel that this page is well-organized and well-written?
 * Should have at least one internal link and one external link
 * Gives sources.
 * An image in the article with captions
 * Divided by headings.
 * If the article is about where records are the external link could take us there if possible.
 * Compliant with Style guide
 * Give comprehensiveness of collection, such as transcribed or user submitted
 * When applicable dates included
 * If there is a cost, state that there is a cost.
 * Why is the record worth searching?


 * Hi Dawne, I have moved your comments to this page as they are about the FA criteria. The thread I believe you mentioned is Featured Articles started on May 23. Please go ahead and make changes to this page as you see fit. --Steve 16:44, 15 July 2011 (UTC)