FamilySearch Wiki:Contributors Meeting 9 Aug 2011

Join the meeting, the ID is 7770 1 p.m. Mountain time on Tuesdays

New to this meeting?


 * You can join up to 10 minutes early. If you try to join the meeting at any other time, you will get an error that the meeting doesn't exist.
 * Prior to joining the meeting for the first time, run the MeetingPlace Test to verify that you can participate in a web meeting.

Business/Announcements

 * Community News

Project Help Requests

 * Need help with your project? See a project that needs to be done? Add it here:

Improve the Wiki

 * What are the "committees" that are needed to fulfill various tasks in the wiki? (Not that we are ready or need to create all of these comittees, we just want to brainstorm a list.) Here are a couple of examples, what else:
 * All content projects
 * Community Council
 * Design committee - searching out and adding good images to pages
 * -- janellv (talk | contribs) 15:34, 4 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Well organised and established WikiProjects should be the driving force behind various tasks. These projects could be grouped by locality such as FamilySearch Wiki:WikiProject Idaho or around a specific topic. Examples of the kind of topics that could be improved by a WikiProjects are 1) Census records, 2) a specific period in history, or 3) a specific wiki policy. Where articles fall within the scope of more than one WikiProjects, they should work together and not at cross purposes.
 * I've thought for a long time that it would be helpful for page adoptors to also take the lead in running WikiProjects.
 * Tasks within these projects could include searching out and adding good: 1) content, 2) images. I think a project or committee that was organised just to add images could work as long as they didn't tread on the toes of an already active WikiProject.
 * In addition to these content/improvement WikiProjects, mentioned above (those that at operate at a grass-roots level), I do feel that there is a need for one or more strategic level committee(s), that would look at issues of governance, policy, guidelines, arbitration, community proposals and the like. Of course the members of these various committees/projects will be somewhat fluid and overlap, but it would be useful to document how these groups are organised and what each covers in terms of scope. For example the recent discussions held about the layout of US county pages, in my opinion fell under the scope of policy/guideline - the outcome of which is documented for the content/improvement projects to adopt. This point of documenting decisions and processes in the wiki is particularly important to engage with community members that are not able to participate via MeetingPlace.
 * --Steve (talk | contribs) 14:04, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Forums Overview

 * Be part of the solution! Make your opinions known! Post comments to an existing thread or start a new discussion at Wiki Contributors Corner forum.