Template talk:WorldCat

Regional versions
This template is fine but it doesn't work with regional WorldCat/OCLC such as Summit.worldcat.org

Books, etc listed in Summit more often than not are not listed in general WorldCat/OCLC.

Wallowa County, Oregon shows a lot of records not in the standard one but limited and found only in the Summit. dsammy 05:29, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I understand your query, but I have compared some of the results that are produced and found whether the summit sub-domain is used or not does not affect the main results returned. For example
 * http://summit.worldcat.org/oclc/56341631/editions
 * http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/56341631/editions
 * and
 * http://summit.worldcat.org/oclc/27993061
 * http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/27993061
 * Each pair return the same catalog item, the difference being that the summit link provides Get this item results for locations in Oregon or Washington. Not all users of the wiki will be researching Oregon or Washington from Oregon or Washington. --Steve 16:22, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Big difference, you didn't follow through, more libraries listed in Summit than in global and not only that, giving exact and very clear info where to find them. dsammy 16:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * In that case I suggest adding a domain parameter to the template with the default set to www, but allow the possibility of changing the sub-domain if needed. --Steve 17:01, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Good suggestion . . . I have already started taking a look at that (what was that saying, two great minds think alike). I will be doing more research on this and feel discussion would be in order for this. Thomas Lerman 17:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Using the template
Tried first two methods, both failed miserably. They linked to template instead of the item in the OCLC. dsammy 07:06, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I would like to find out more about the region version of WorldCat. Is there a website that has the various regional WorldCats listed? What failed miserably? I do not understand your last two sentences. Maybe include examples, please. Some discussion started here. Thomas Lerman 14:59, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I found Summit by accident while searching for books through Google.


 * The reason your attempts to use WorldCat failed. First you typed the name of the template with a lower case "c". Apart from the first letter, article and templates are case sensitive. Your second attempt used the tlx template which is used in wikitext to help display the code to type when using a template. --Steve 16:06, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I followed the instructions and they failed, both with and withouth t1. Both failed ones linked to template rather than the OCLC record. I did try 3rd and it failed. I see Steve got it right somehow.


 * DSammy, how about examples? The tlx template would not be used when accessing templates, it is just used for displaying what a template looks like. All templates are case sensitive. The examples in the WorldCat template were copied and pasted from what is displayed, so I do not know how they could have "failed" for you. Could you please provide examples? Thomas Lerman 16:56, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * If you review the edit history of Wallowa County, Oregon you will see the Dsammy's failed attempts to use WorldCat --Steve 18:19, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

After the meeting today, I've spent awhile studying and using the WorldCat template. As you suspected, Thomas, I DO like it. Since I am creating many pages that are similar, with similar bibliographies, I use a lot of cut and paste. But I can see that when a unique page is created with a unique bibliography, the template would save time and be less likely to have typos in it, assuming I get the number right! Are you looking for mare specific input? What would you like to know from me? Jbparker 23:48, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Editions
Currently unless is either given as isbn or issn the word editions is added to the output URL. Is this the intended outcome? From the links given in the notes section, I assume not, but maybe they've not been updated. --Steve 18:11, 13 August 2009 (UTC)