South Dakota Population Schedule Indexes: Fiche, Film, or Book

United States &gt;  U.S. Census  &gt;  South Dakota &gt;  Census  &gt;  Population Schedule Indexes: Fiche, Film, or Book

Nationwide

 * Ronald Vern Jackson, A.I.S. U.S. Census Indexes (on Microfiche) (Bountiful, Utah: Accelerated Indexing Systems, 1984). Also in Ancestry.com online.


 * Search 1 1607-1819 Entire United States
 * Search 2 1820-1829 Entire United States
 * Search 3 1830-1839 Entire United States
 * Search 4 1840-1849 Entire United States
 * Search 5 1850-1860 Southern States
 * Search 6 1850 New England and northern states
 * Search 7 1850-1906 Midwestern and western states
 * Search 7a 1850-1906 Entire United States (searches 5, 6, and 7 combined)
 * Search 8 U.S. Mortality schedules


 * For a resource guide to using them, see Accelerated Indexing Systems U.S. Census Indexes (on Microfiche).

1890 Population schedule fragments
Includes only fragments for one family in Union County (Jefferson Township).


 * Ken Nelson, 1890 U.S. Census: Index to Surviving Population Schedules and Register of Film Numbers to the Special Census of Union Veterans, rev. ed. (Salt Lake City: Family History Library, 1991)[FHL Book 973 X2na; Film 1421673 item 11; Digitized at BYU Family History Archives].
 * Helen Smothers Swenson, and Frances Terry Ingmire, Index to 1890 Census of the United States(St. Louis, Mo.: F.T. Ingmire, 1981)[FHL Book 973 X2sw 1890].
 * United States, National Archives and Records Service, Index to the Eleventh Census of the United States, 1890, National Archives Microfilm Publications, Microcopy no. 496 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives, 1963)[FHL Film 543341-42].

1850

 * Residents of what is now South Dakota residents were included as part of the 1850 Minnesota (Pembina District) Territory Census.

1840

 * Residents of what is now South Dakota were included as part of the 1840 Iowa Territory Census.

1836

 * Residents of what is now South Dakota theoretically would have been included as part of the 1936 Wisconsin Territory census. Apparently the Wisconsin governor chose to ignore them and may not have asked a sheriff to conduct a census in what is now South Dakota.