United States Census, 1910 - FamilySearch Historical Records/Known Issues

Known Issues
NOTE: If the census record is for Puerto Rico (both a Spanish and English speaking country), the possibility exists that the race designator "B" could have been for Blanco (white) and not Black.

Question #1: Why am I not able to view the image when I login, but am directed to Ancestry.com where I have to pay for the image? Are there other options for viewing the images? Answer #1: 


 * FamilySearch has rights to publish images online to users from the supporting organization only (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints). Patrons logging in with an LDS account will be able to view the images at the FamilySearch.org. You may also view the images without cost at our FamilySearch Centers.
 * The films may be ordered from the Family History Library Catalog. (See Ordering Microfilm and Microfiche) They can then be viewed at a local FamilySearch Center.
 * U.S. Censuses can also be viewed free of charge through Heritage Quest at local libraries.

Question #2: The images I have been looking for are out of focus. What can I do to help me read the images? Answer #2: The problems with the images occurred because exposures varied on the original films. Rescanning will not improve the quality.

Question #3: Some records give the township and county as Moulton or Mason, Murray, Minnesota when the image shows that the record is from McLeod County, Minnesota. Which is correct? Answer #3: These records, images 425 to 825 found in the file labeled DGS Film Number 004330232 are from McLeod County. Question #4: On the indexed information page there are times when two unrelated families appear to be linked together as one family or a family member appears to be missing. Is there a way to verify this? Answer #4: There were times when the census taker did not number families separately or when he/she numbered the family separately beginning with the wife, instead of the husband. There are also times when the enumerator may have recorded pages out of sequence which caused confusion when the records were indexed. The best solution when you see inconsistencies is to look at the surrounding images to find your connections. Indexers do their best, but the original image is your best source.

Question #5: I am looking for an ancestor in Provo, Utah. Are there missing pages in that area? Answer #5: Ward 4, Provo, Utah, Utah, Enumeration District 195, sheet 22A is missing from the online collection. The missing sheet may be viewed in Frame 188 of the FHL microfilm 1375623. For other options refer to Question and Answer #1.

If you encounter additional problems with this collection, feel free to report them at [mailto:support@familysearch.org support@familysearch.org]. Please include the following information:


 * If searching a specific collection: please include the name of the collection; include all search criteria used, including name, event, dates and places.
 * If browsing this collection: please include the full path you followed to where the problem occurred. The browse path is located above the Image viewer window. For example: United States Census, 1910 &gt; 004327326 &gt; Image 200 if 1489.
 * If you are reporting a technical issue: please include your operating system and browser version, such as Windows XP and Internet Explorer.

Your assistance will help ensure that future revisions will be considered.

Return to the United States Census Population Schedules 1910 (FamiySearch Historical Records) Learn More page. Return to the United States Census, 1910 collection at FamilySearch.org.