User:Bloosgrl/sandbox43

Option 1: Send them to FS church collection, regardless judicial district
Pros 1. sends the user to an indexed collection first, which is a simple solution 2. needs less maintenance/updating Cons 1. Coverage on the indexed collection is limited. Users may not find anything because the town they need is not included 2.
 * If searching for place name doesn't work, try alternate name, parish name or judicial district. To find more alternate place names, see FamilySearch Places or Czech Republic Gazetteers.
 * If the place name has two words, try reversing the order and searching, for example: Mlada Boleslav might be Boleslav Mlada.

Option 2: Send them to the archive first
Pros 1. Better geographic coverage. Cons 1. Sends the user to browsable images where they have to search for the town and select the right church book. 2. User may need coaching on how to search and to find the records they need. (distinguishing between church, census, school registries, etc.) 3. User must know the town to use the archives. 4. Zamrsk archive sends users to a PDF to search for parish. The entire parish book must be downloaded and searched. Each page is it's own image file.
 * If searching for place name doesn't work, try alternate name, parish name or judicial district. To find more alternate place names, see FamilySearch Places or Czech Republic Gazetteers.
 * If the place name has two words, try reversing the order and searching, for example: Mlada Boleslav might be Boleslav Mlada.

Option 3: Send them to FS church collection regardless of judicial district, but support with a coverage table
Pros 1. Needs less updating/maintenance. 2. When the user doesn't find the record, we can refer to coverage table to educate about the collection. 3. A little more "honest" then just sending the user to the collection and never explaining limited coverage. 4. Sends users to an indexed collection first. (simplicity) Cons 1. Users don't know before they search about limitations. 2. Users may not read the HR article and miss the limitations entirely.
 * If searching for place name doesn't work, try alternate name, parish name or judicial district. To find more alternate place names, see FamilySearch Places or Czech Republic Gazetteers.
 * If the place name has two words, try reversing the order and searching, for example: Mlada Boleslav might be Boleslav Mlada.

Option 4: Send them to the FS collection only when Jeff's coverage table indicates the judicial district is included
Pros 1. The most "honest" at the time it is updated. 2. Users are sent to an indexed collection first. Cons 1. needs maintenance. 2. Lag between the collection being updated and GR pages being updated may mislead users about where the records are. 3. How will we know which judicial districts are updated? 4. Missionaries might not be able assist with maintenance, as we protect all GR pages. This creates more work for the Wiki content team.