FamilySearch Wiki:WikiProject Utah Project leaders meeting

Attend the meeting meeting ID: 3220. 9:00 a.m. Tuesday mornings, virtual meeting, not recorded.

25 Sept 2012
Report of UGA Fall Conference:
 * They both attended conference, some of the same classes. If you have purchased a certificate from England, you can publish it, but others cannot use it as a legal document.
 * didn't get many volunteers, last count on survey 8 responses were Liz's changes.
 * About 1/2 of the handouts were given, had a lot of good responses on Friday, but on Saturday, gave hardly any away
 * as of this morning, no one has filled out the survey. There were so many handouts, it's going to take people a couple of days to review them.
 * No ancestors in Utah, those who were interested were already doing a wiki project - Civil War No emails either. There were a lot of missionaries there - maybe they already have an assigned project.
 * Future conferences: was this worth it? Unless we get at least 7 nibbles, it's not worth doing the flyers nor doing the conference for recruits. This conference was for less involved, less serious genealogists, more beginners
 * They need more of an exposure to the wiki, rather than a help us with it.
 * A learning experience
 * UGA gave away a computer, so did Legacy.
 * Most of the prizes did not make people want to help
 * Jana lost her audio, so we don't have her ideas.
 * Had to come to our table to get their prize drawing thing signed.

Recruiting ideas:
 * Utah familysearch centers
 * UGA website - Liz learned about it
 * ICAPGen conference - 19-20 October. No wiki class.
 * If a conference again, just have them inserted into the packet for registrants
 * Can still have a booth and talk to people
 * Try at SLIG
 * RootsTech
 * Historical/genealogical/DUP's/museums in areas (get DUP contact info from international website)
 * Librarians may know of the above

Flyer:
 * Tweek to flyer: Needs Utah Genealogical Association on it, since they sponsor the prizes. (Noticed only after the conference was over, of course) Also FamilySearch Logo (Can we do this? Wilma find out) UGA logo also the UGA adoption logo
 * So much information given in easy to understand pieces. Too bad MediaWiki software doesn't allow for "thought clusters" around the page.

Prep for meeting tomorrow:
 * Births - ongoing. Early years have been completed by Lois. Later years in process. (Liz)
 * Utah for beginners (Jana) Link in the chat.
 * County level Church Records
 * Other

18 Sept 2012
Flyer discussion, tweeks Fall conference

11 Sept 2012
Nuts and bolts


 * Poll for policy guidelines
 * Cancel next week.
 * Plan tomorrow's meeting (60 minutes)
 * Utah page report or discussion? (5 minutes) Then possibly after James there will be time to open for questions which may entail both pages anyway. Jana to share?
 * How to find birth records in US / Utah? (10 minutes)
 * Coordinate w/Utah page, since it will likely feed to it.
 * Let him report - limit the time. He may ask for feedback. We can place our feedback on his talk page or email.
 * Births report - How many counties are done
 * Church records report or discussion? (15 minutes)
 * Handout for UGA conference in Sandy next week
 * Jana will create it (she has a MAC)
 * Training could be offered in this meeting in October (Wilma will be in FamilyTree training)
 * How many to print? Any ideas? Wilma check registration.
 * Cost reimbursed by Wilma and will be reimbursed by UGA
 * Funeral homes, public libraries, church records, local museums

Check the topic you are interested in.


 * Which county(s) or city(s) do you prefer to work with? Fill in blank
 * What do we want them to do? 1) List the libraries, churches, etc., 2) link to website and catalog, 3) learn unique holdings?, 3) Utah or a county room or section?
 * Turning in their papers? Contacting us?
 * Form they will fill out and return it -- or contact info (new gmail account. UtahWikiProject (user name) password: ProjectLeaders2012 Liz will set it up.
 * Their skill levels
 * Constructive use of their time
 * Do they want to 2) gather by phone, 3) in person, or only on the 1) Internet
 * Contact info -- theirs and ours
 * Inviting and interesting (help!) I can make a difference and I can learn something.
 * Invite your ideas on how, and we want consistency
 * We will provide a "pattern" and training at all levels
 * Online (Training schedule: Tuesdays, 9 a.m. October

Vision thinking (brainstorm)


 * DUP museum, museums
 * Death-related records page: Possible format at WikiHow
 * Historical societies, archives -- gleaning

4 September 2012

 * Birth templates, Utah State Archives, etc.
 * Can we have Liz proceed with birth area for all counties?
 * Just the state archive part or the entire "Since 1897" piece?
 * Liz went to BYU library and looked at every film. There are differences as some DO give the names of the children.
 * What about the other state archive holdings? Liz or prepare a project description?
 * Pattern page for Church Records -- Wilma
 * Funeral homes -- the bad news from Lois, plans for tomorrow's meeting
 * We will make further plans, but do they have
 * Strategy: pick a county - check death records for that county and look for names of funeral homes, then contact funeral director about that info.
 * Liz does Washington, Jana does Davis County.
 * Sandy UGA Conference -- What shall we recruit with now?
 * Still funeral homes? Remove. Can still do it at last minute
 * Public libraries?
 * Gather names of willing people, include a date for training re: whatever tasks were suggesting
 * Liz/Jana suggestions?
 * Let's have both avenues ready: training for gathering, email info to contact person to enter it; or if you prefer to put it in yourself, contact x person for training.
 * Requests for images of various types of Utah records? (Baby books, Funeral Programs, etc.?)
 * Utah page: request from the Thursday meeting group that we revamp it to interest and guide less experienced researchers. See England page for some ideas. -- Jana
 * What do we name this "sandbox" page? User:JanaStokes/Sandbox Utah
 * Shall we open it to someone else to do, or have us work on it with discussions? There is a difference when someone is writing it as opposed to a group putting it together
 * Painstakingly slow, but in the end it is just sooo good.
 * table at top is one suggestion
 * Death-related records page: Possible format at WikiHow