User talk:Cottrells

England Family History Centres
Henry995 Thanks for editing out the Center spelling. A work in progress but if helpful Orpington England Family History Centre is out there. Feel free to edit cosmetically. I am grateful for a community member spotting these emerging yesterday. Most Centres are unaware of the pages.


 * Hi Henry, thank you for raising this as an issue. Charles Smith created the page FamilySearch Wiki:Family History Centers Naming and Content. I then added a proposed style guide regarding this issue to that page. Please feel free to add you comments to what I have suggested. --Steve 08:06, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Contributor Help
Steve ... thanks for working on the Contributor Help boxes. I put those up for Janell, where she told me to. I am perfectly fine with whatever the two of you decide. Thanks for checking with me, and thanks for everything you do for us. Jane 14:55, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Family History Centers (USA)
Please take a look at the recently changed article Family History Centers and the discussion on the talk/discussion page. I stated my case and I am not going to be involved in a edit war. A member of the SLC FHC department needs to have input here on the different type of FHCs designated in the April 2010 directive. And on similar subject articles.

Please pass this on to an administrator or the appropiate person. Thank you. Jrcrin001 07:36, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi John, thank you for asking me to add my thoughts to Talk:Family History Centers. I agree it may take an authoritative voice from SLC to resolve the issue. I know that the wiki administrators that are FamilySearch employees are on the case. --Steve 09:49, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Changes in welcoming
Steve-

Much thanks to you, for spending time in the Wiki with all the tech changes you help with, we are all in you debt.

As you know we want to improve the process for welcoming new authors and editors in the Wiki. I have spoken both to Janell and Kara and both are excited about the changes you are going to help us make. Even though you know this Steve I wanted to send this to you with changes coming in June: this is in part what I sent:

We will have another Welcome Message Template designed to be more individualized. The others will be there too but we hope that you will use this new welcome message.

Steve Cottrell will be helping us with the Template, a special thanks to him. Please read more carefully what the contributor or editor have put on the page. The current steps listed for reviewing the contributions are good to follow.

Avoid adding the welcome message before following the steps outlined. The question Templates will stay the same.

We thank you again for all you do. Dawne 15:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks Dawne, looking forward to see the changes that you have planned. --Steve 19:57, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Helpme template
Steve, when you get a second, would you mind taking a look at my comment here? Thanks! janellv 19:55, 24 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Janell, I have replied to your comment about the Helpme template --Steve 07:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-English articles
Steve: I created that article in my sandbox thinking it would only be in my sandbox, but I guess not. How do I keep it in my sandbox? Charles -- ccsmith (talk | contribs) 00:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Charles, you may have created the main page in your sandbox, but this page includes template and links to other pages that are not in your sandox. Any page that you wish to be within you sandbox must start with the prefix User:Ccsmith/Sandbox. My question to you is why not develop these Spanish pages directly in the Spanish wiki? --Steve (talk | contribs) 16:19, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Today's meeting agenda
Thanks Steve for explaining exactly what I was trying to get at only so much better. I do think there's a bit of a difference between say content projects and support projects, and then also the committee examples that you mentioned. Are there any other "types" that you can think of? I hope that we can come away from the meeting today with a specific list of needs. Thanks again! -- janellv (talk | contribs) 17:11, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Side bar template for Oxfordshire
Steve,

In checking a page, Oxfordshire, personal names, I thought the page should be deleted. It had a To Do template on it, but the pages that link out from it are already deleted and the subject doesn't fit the wiki scope. In checking what links to this page, there are several pages and one of them, Oxfordshire uses the side bar template that you put there. If I delete the personal names topic from that template, will it cause a problem? L Avery 20:05, 17 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Lynda, my understanding of the situation with the page Oxfordshire Names, Personal was it was the content that was a problem, not the page itself. According to the Category:Names Personal articles about the subject Names, Personal should be about the etymology, history, and meaning of names of individuals, either surnames or given names. So I would say remove the content, but not the page. --Steve (talk | contribs) 15:33, 19 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Shall I just leave the template alone for the topic, Personal Names, then? By taking out the content, there won't be much left on the page, itself.L Avery 17:01, 19 August 2011 (UTC)


 * You are right there will be no content left, but the subject is legitimate, so you could add a Stub template. If you do delete the page do not say that the page was invalid - only that the content was misplaced/not suitable. The template used to create the sidebar on the Oxfordshire page Sidebar and the other one creating the other links to the page Place do not need to be amended. --Steve (talk | contribs) 17:10, 19 August 2011 (UTC):Thanks. Did as recommended.L Avery 19:29, 19 August 2011 (UTC)