Talk:FamilySearch Indexing: US, New England–Naturalization Index 1791-1906, Project Updates

I think I remember seeing a slide in the presentation that used "Victoria" (no country or other clue to identify city/state/povince) as an example of Place of Birth that wouldn't be indexed because it could be too many places, ie a City, State/Province in more than one part of the world. I don't see this slide there now. Was it removed because Basic Guidelines for indexing Place say: "If unknown if the place recorded was a city, county, state, etc., put the locality in the smallest geographical division."? My interpretation of basic guidelines would be to put Victoria as a city in this case. I'm seeing a lot of confusing remarks on the facebook page. Maybe a note could be added to project updates as to why the slide was removed and to restate basic guidelines for indexing Place of Birth. An updated version of the Victoria slide could be shown as the example to illustrate that City would be the correct field.