Talk:Surrey Census

BROKEN LINKS A large number of links on this page are broken and are in need of repair. The problem is similar to the Sussex Census which required substantial revision. Could this page be fixed? Discovered when working on the Alfold, Surrey and Alfold, Sussex pages. Chichgirl 20 August 2011

BROKEN LINKS

parishes Oxted- Wyke have been incorrectly entered to result in Wyke discovered when Oxted returned incorrect link Sopsteele 10:36, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

BROKEN LINKS

parishes Oxted- Wyke now fixed but I am unable to second guess some lines entered without parish name. Suggest that the page needs to be reviewed to ensure that all parishes are linked. Suggest Oxted -Wyke links already entered need checking to ensure parish page links work with Partially corrected page Decars 05:48, 28 August 2011 (UTC) Albury, Surrey-Farleigh, Surrey are broken link to Farleigh Library Catalogue page only and need fixing Page now fixed as far as possible to identify parish entries.

MYSTERY LINKs

I (and others) are approaching this page in order to overlap Surrey parish links in the Sussex Parishes which neighbour our existing content in order to connect Poor Law Unions and registration districts. I am mystified by some numbered entries Number 1 as an example gives a Catalogue entry which reads "Kent County Archives inventory title is: (U971) Messrs. Day, Rooke and Co.

Contains detailed abstracts of land ownership of Boughton Monchelsea, Loose, East Farleigh, Langley and Ebony in the Isle of Oxney.

IN Finding aids / Kent County Archives Office."

Quite what this has to do with Surrey Census escapes me!! Could FamilySearch please offer some undertaking to rework this page which contributors have corrected as far as possible to repair the original broken links. Chichgirl 08:27, 9 September 2011 (UTC)