Spain, Catastro de Ensenada - FamilySearch Historical Records/Known Issues

Known Issues
Question #1: The Catalog Notes for many localities in the Province of Granada (Andalucía) include a note in RED that states “Records of Spain, Catastro de Ensenada are available online, click here.” However, I cannot find any records online for these localities. Where can these missing records be found? Answer #1: If you perform a Catalog search using the Keywords (beta): “Catastro de Ensenada, Granada, online”, you will find a list of approximately 146 localities that will NOT be found online. You can find these records on microfilm following the search, by clicking on the film number of interest, and view the film at the Family History Library or some FamilySearch Centers. Call ahead to check if the film is available at your local center. Question #2: The Catalog Notes for many localities in the Province of Jaén include a note in RED that states “Records of Spain, Catastro de Ensenada are available online, click here.” However, I cannot find any records online for these localities. Where can these missing records be found?

Answer #2: If you perform a Catalog search using the Keywords (beta): “Catastro de Ensenada, Jaén, online”, you will find a list of approximately 17 localities that will NOT be found online. A short list of these missing localities and the associated Film Numbers are provided for your convenience:

In addition, the first locality Jaén &gt; Albanchez de Mágina should be listed as Jaén &gt; Albanchez de Úbeda.

Question 3
Question 3: Is Ciudad Real the correct Provincia for Montearagón? Answer #3: The correct Provincia for Montearagón is Toledo, not Ciudad Real. The records located at Ciudad Real &gt; Montearagón should be relocated to Toledo &gt; Montearagón.

Question 4
Question 4: Is Ciudad Real the correct Provincia for Chillón? Answer 4: Yes, however, specific to the Catastro del Marqués de la Ensenada : Chillón is considered to be in Córdoba. Please read the following translated notes from our Catalog (Keyword search using Chillón, Spain): Microfilm of manuscripts in the Municipal Archives of the city of Cordoba. Census of the farms taken under the direction of the Marquis de la Ensenada, Don Zenon de Somodevilla. The town of Chillon does not exist in the province of Córdoba today. In 1849, the town of Chillon, which is located on the provincial boundaries, appears as a village in the province of Ciudad Real. It may well be the same town, if the provincial boundary had not changed.

Question 5
Question 5: When searching Spain,Catastro de Ensenada, 1749-1756 > Jaén > Baeza, I found that 454 records are missing between Vol. 7624 and Vol. 7625. Jumps from record #1108 to #1564. Can they be found? Filmed? And added?

Answer 5: When checking the microfilm #1458754, the records #1109 to #1563 (454 records) are missing between Volume 7624 and Volume 7625. It is unlikely they were in the original volumes because we go from volume 53 to volume 54 and the missing pages are right in between and the last image from volume 53 is clearly the end of the book. It is likely these missing numbers were not in existence when the volume numbering occurred. Not likely in existence at the archive.

If you encounter additional problems with this collection, feel free to report them at [mailto:support@familysearch.org support@familysearch.org]. Please include the following information:


 * If browsing this collection: please include the full path you followed to where the problem occurred. The browse path is located above the Image viewer window. For example: Spain, Catastro de Ensenada, 1749-1756 &gt; Madrid &gt; Villalbilla &gt; Volumen H-1831 - Autos generals &gt; Image 16 of 34.
 * If you are reporting a technical issue: please include your operating system and browser version, such as Windows 7 and Internet Explorer.

Your assistance will help ensure that future revisions will be considered.

Return to the Spain, Catastro de Ensenada - FamilySearch Historical Records article.

Return to the Spain, Catastro de Ensenada, 1749-1756 collection at FamilySearch.org.