File:SOS FAMILY.jpg

To be able to verify the license claimed, the Wiki community needs a better documented source. Citing the author as the source should only be done by the author himself. All others should source cite and link to the book or website source where they obtained the image (and thereby the original license statement). If this image description is implying M. Scott Simkins is hereby releasing this image into the public domain, the license needs to say so more explicitly (and be entered by M. Scott Simpkins, or his authorized-and-so-stated agent) so we know the FamilySearch Research Wiki is the place of the ORIGINAL license. If Scott Simpkins released it elsewhere, the source statement needs to point us to that place--not just re-state the name of the creator/author. We need to document and be able to VERIFY the actual ORIGINAL legal license that allows our Wiki to use the image. This image description as presently worded does not yet give us enough information to do that. Because neither the untraceable source nor the unverified license statement show otherwise as presently worded, the image is still suspected to be an unlicensed image. DiltsGD 03:41, 27 July 2012 (UTC)